Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121928 (ALL)

MATA PRASAD AND OTHERS v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/605/2025 · 2025-02-07

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7995 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 605 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mata Prasad And Others Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mehdi Abbas Rizvi,Mohan Singh,Prashant Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 3 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Mohan Singh learned counsel has received notice on behalf of respondent no.2-Gaon Sabha. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent No.4 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of the Revision No.1382/2022; Computerized Case No.C202204000001382 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Revision No.1382/2022; Computerized Case No.C202204000001382 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The petitioner shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.2.2025/Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench