Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12191 (JHR)

AMIT DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3423/2025 · 2025-05-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13302] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3423 of 2025 ------ Amit Das, aged about 22 years, son of Shukar Das, resident of Village- Govindpur, P.O.- Ghorlash, P.S- Jasidih, District- Deoghar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kr. Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.17 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B, 66C, 66D, 84C of the I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only because one mobile phone and SIM Card were recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.02.2025 as mentioned in para-15 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-9 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes not to annoy or disturb any of the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.17 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb any of the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/