TEJ BAHADUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE CIVIL SECRETARIAT LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/110/2025 · 2025-02-06
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121906 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121906 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7860 Court No. - 7 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 110 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tej Bahadur Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Civil Secretariat Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kuldeep Pandey,Shivangi Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 to 4 to take the decision on the representation dated 27-01-2025 moved by petitioner for eviction the illegal encroachment bearing Gata No. 908 measuring area 0.1630 Hect., recorded as Khad Gaddha situated at Village Gurudattganj, H/o-Juthipur, Tehsil-Gauriganj, District- Amethi, recorded in revenue records, which is contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions, which are taken on record, states that on measurement, no construction is found on the public utility land and the construction stood on the north of the public utility land.
4. In view of the above, no direction can be issued as prayed in the present petition. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take any appropriate step, in case he is aggrieved with the demarcation proceedings in accordance with law.
5. The petition is disposed of in terms of the above. Order Date :- 6.2.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench