CHANDAN PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. U.P. P.W.D. LUCKNOW AND ANR.
WRIA/1495/2025 · 2025-09-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121896 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1495 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the concerned authority to expedite the process for compliance of point no. 3 of the order dated 1.10.2024 for release of dues of petitioner.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2-Engineer inChief (H.O.D.) Uttar Pradesh Public Work Department, Lucknow or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same expeditiously within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is served to opposite party no.
2.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, petition stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : In Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Chandan Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. U.P. P.W.D. Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench