Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121889 (ALL)

HARISH YADAV v. SMT. PHOOLMATI DEVI

CRLR/150/2025 · 2025-02-06

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7765 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 150 of 2025 Revisionist :- Harish Yadav Opposite Party :- Smt. Phoolmati Devi Counsel for Revisionist :- Utkarsh Kumar,Ajeet Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist. Notice to respondent no. 2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. This revision has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 16.12.2024, whereby the application filed by respondent no. 2 under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has been allowed, directing the revisionist to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month from the date of filing of the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Rs. 6,000/- per month from the date of the order dated 16.12.2024. Perused the record. Perusal of the record, shows that it is undisputed that the respondent is the legally wedded wife of the revisionist. The revisionist has neglected to provide maintenance to his wife. The respondent is residing separately for a valid reason, is destitute, and unable to sustain herself. On the other hand, the revisionist holds a postgraduate degree in political science and has the capacity to maintain the respondent. Furthermore, learned counsel for the revisionist also could not show from the record that any amount of interim maintenance has been paid by him to the respondent. There appears to be no illegality in the order impugned. The revision is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 6.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench