OM DUTTA v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/1606/2025 · 2025-02-10
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121887 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121887 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8281 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1606 of 2025 Petitioner :- Om Dutta Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Communication New Delhi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dwijendra Mishra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for opposite party no. 1 and Mr. Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 2 & 4. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no. 3 stands dispensed with. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of privilege leave encashment along with interest due to petitioner on account of his superannuation on 31.08.2023 from the Bangalore Unit of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the aforesaid payment is to be made by the Unit at Bangalore but only upon recommendation by the Unit Head at Mankapur, Gonda. For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before authority concerned. Considering innocuous prayer and without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 4 i.e. Unit Head (Mankapur), ITI Limited, Gonda who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 10.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench