SMT. SHAMIM BANO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1022/2025 · 2025-02-06
Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7711-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1022 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Shamim Bano And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar,Shahbaz Salam,Shrikant Tripathi,Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A., who appears on behalf of the State- respondents. 2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to directing the opposite party no. 2, 3 & 4 to provide adequate protection to the petitioners from harassment of the opposite party no.5/ father of the petitioner no.1. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no.1 to 5 to see that the petitioners are not harassed or victimized only because they have married out of their free-will. (iii) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties not to disturb in the life and liberty of the petitioners and the family members of the petitioner no.2"
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.2 are both major, who on their own volition and free will have got married out of their own sweet will with each other in accordance with Muslim rites on 31.01.2025, but the family members of petitioner no.1 are unhappy with such marriage. In support of his submission that petitioners no.1 and 2 are major, learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn our attention to the annexure no.2 to the petition. They are being harassed by the
opposite party No.5, who is the father of petitioner no.1. They therefore prayed for the benefit of the judgement rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. and another, 2006 (5) SCC 475 and the observations made in paragraph 17 which reads as under:-
"17.....
We,
therefore,
direct
that
the administration/police authorities throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a women or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law."
4. This Court has found from the perusal of judgement rendered in Lata Singh's case (supra) wherein the appellants had approached the Supreme Court against the police harassment because of F.I.R. being lodged by the brother of appellant no.1. 5. In the case of the petitioners there is no F.I.R. lodged. The police cannot be presumed to harass the petitioners only under the influence of the private respondent No.5. The action of Police is governed by the provision of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as BNSS). Particularly, Chapter XIII of BNSS, corresponding Chapter XII of Cr.P.C., makes provision for information to Police and their power to investigate. In absence of any proof of such information regarding which the provision has been made under Sections 173 and 174 of BNSS, corresponding Sections 154 and 155 Cr.P.C., respectively, it will not be justified to grant a blanket protection to the petitioners as prayed. 6.
This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners that in case they are being threatened by their family members, they may file an application under Section 154(2) or 154(3) of the Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 173 (2) or 173 (3) of B.N.S.S., 2023) before the Police Station/Superintendent of Police concerned, or move an application under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 175 (3) of B.N.S.S., 2023) before the Magistrate concerned or file
a complaint case under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. (corresponding Section 223 of B.N.S.S., 2023) before the authorities concerned. 7. It is provided that the petitioners shall get their marriage registered by making an appropriate application under the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017. (Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I, J.) (Sangeeta Chandra, J.) Order Date :- 6.2.2025 cks/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench