[2025:RJ-JP:15420] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3966/2025 Manoj S/o Ramchand, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Mahmadpur, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP Mr. Surendra Singh, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/04/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.263/2024, registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 125 and 352 of B.N.S., the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the FIR filed by the Complainant itself is exonerated, the other co-accused Bijendri has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 17.01.2025. It is also contended that no firearm were recovered from any of the co- accused named in the FIR, this itself shows that the FIR is vague and exonerated. The accused-petitioner-party also lodged a cross FIR against the complainant-party, but the Police has taken no [2025:RJ-JP:15420] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3966/2025] action in the said cross FIR. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, therefore the anticipatory bail application of the accused petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the main allegation of causing grievous injuries with sharp weapon to the injured Palendra is against the present petitioner, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the main allegation of causing grievous injuries with sharp weapon is against present accused petitioner, therefore, this Court is not inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner stands dismissed with liberty to surrender before the concerned Court and the concerned Court shall make all endeavors to decide the bail application of the accused- petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-28