GAJRAJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THR THE SEC. DEPT OF SEC. EDU AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/1712/2005 · 2025-05-16
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121832 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121832 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28799 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1712 of 2005 Petitioner :- Gajraj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thr The Sec. Dept Of Sec. Edu And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Kumar Srivastava,Avnish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following main prayer for: issuing a writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of a direction to the opposite party nos. 1 to 3 to include the name of the petitioners in the list of Clerks of the College to receive their salary out of grant-in-aid fund of the State Government in accordance with the provisions of U.P. High School & Intermediate Colleges (Payments of Salaries of Teachers & other Employees) Act, 1971 with effect from the same date other similarly situated clerk working in the college has been allowed the benefit of his salary out of grant-in- aid fund of the State Government in pursuance of Government Order dated 27.10.2004, the true copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to file representation before the DIOS, Ambedkar Nagar, who will consider and decide the representation of the petitioner and he also requests for issuing a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner within the stipulated period.
4. On the other hand, learned Standing Counsel has opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and in this regard he has already filed a counter affidavit.
5. In view of aforesaid and without entering in to the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction that if any representation is filed by the petitioner within 10 days from today, opposite party no. 3- Deputy Inspector of Schools, Ambedkar Nagar shall consider and decide the same within six weeks thereafter in accordance with law. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench