MAHENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEHRADUN
C482/1970/2022 · 2025-05-01
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12181 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12181 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C482 No.1970 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the applicants.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
3. There is no representation for respondent no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the present C482 application.
5. Accordingly present C482 application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
01.05.2025 SK