SRI MOMIN ALI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY
WPMS/1527/2014 · 2025-10-08
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1218 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1218 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.1455 of 2014
With WPMS No.1527 of 2014 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Neelima Mishra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners.
2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State.
3. Mr. Atul Bansal, Advocate for respondent no.5.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that she has got no instructions in the matter.
5. Accordingly writ petitions are dismissed for non prosecution.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
08.10.2025 SK