Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121788 (ALL)

CHANDRA PRAKASH v. SUB DIVISION MAGISTRATE, LALGANJ, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/788/2025 · 2025-02-17

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9980 Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 788 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Respondent :- Sub Division Magistrate, Lalganj, Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 10 and Mr. Mohd. Talib Khan, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for opposite party no.9. In view of order being passed notices to opposite parties 2 to 8 stand dispensed with. 2. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to authority concerned to decide Case No.2000/2024(Chandra Prakash and others v. Raju and others) instituted by petitioner under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code. 3. From a perusal of order sheet, it however appears that all the defendants in aforesaid proceedings have not yet put in appearance. 4. In view of aforesaid, opposite party no.1 i.e. Sub-Division Magistrate, Lalganj, Pratapgarh is directed to consider and decide aforesaid proceedings expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date service report regarding service upon all the defendants have brought on record of the proceedings in case there is no other legal impediment 5. Benefit of this order shall be available to petitioner only in case he cooperates in early disposal of the proceedings.. 6. With aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench