MOHAMMAD ZAUL v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/625/2025 · 2025-02-07
Jaspreet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121779 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121779 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8198
Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 625 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Zaul Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambrish Kumar Dwivedi,Abhishek Dwivedi,Akhil Bajpai,Harshita Dwivedi,Sanjeev Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent no.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. The record indicates that the petitioner had earlier filed a Writ-C No.70 of
2025. However, the same was withdrawn with liberty to file fresh with updated order sheets. Once again the instant petition has been filed in furtherance of the liberty so granted and in the instant petition, the petitioner has not impleaded the parties who were parties in the revision which is pending before the revisional court. Accordingly, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition. The petition is rejected. It is also noticed that the petitioner is seeking expeditious disposal of an appeal which is pending in the Court of Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, who is an authority subordinate to the Board of revenue in terms of Rule 494 of the Revenue Code and the petitioner has adequate remedy of seeking relief. For the aforesaid reason, the petition is dismissed with the liberty to the petitioner to seek recourse to the provision in terms of Regulation 494 of the Revenue Code. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 ank Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench