Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12172 (AP)

Alluri Sarada Devi, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6252/2019 · 2025-08-03

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010142762019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6252/2019 Between: 1. ALLURI SARADA DEVI, W/O KRISHNA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O H.NO.16-5-B, OFFICIAL COLONY, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. O.GURUNADH, S/O LATE SATHANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O H.NO.5-2-89/ 1, PEDAJALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. PENUMATSA SARRAJU, S/O BALARAMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O D.NO.16-5-12, OFFICIAL COLONY, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. NEETI PRABHAVATHI, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O D.NO.11-17-3, SIVAJINAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. L.ANANTHA LAKSHMI, W/O SRINU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O H.NO.16-1-18, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. N.NAGAMANI, W/O LATE KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O H.NO.17-11-31/A, KOTHAJALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. VEGIRAJU SYAMALA, W/O RAMAKRISHNA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O 9-91, GANDHINAGAR, GARAGAPARRU, W.G.DIST. 8. S.SAVITRI,, W/O LATE VENKATA RANGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O H.NO.40-13-4(1), DHARMA NAGAR R.S., VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 9. P.RAMARAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC-DAILY WAGER, R/O D.NO.39-1- 31/23/3, SINGAVOYA METTA, MURALI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 10. SATTI VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O BRAHMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O 11-14-C, KONDAKUDURU VILLAGE, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 11. TEETHALA CHELLAYAMMA, W/O GOPALAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O H.NO.9-64, PALLAPUVARI STREET, KONDAKUDURU, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 12. TAMELAMPUDI VENKAT REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O H.NO.8-29, POOSALA STREET, KONDAKUDURU VILLAGE, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 13. GOLUGURI SATTI REDDY, S/O SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O 8-90A, SANGAM STREET, BICCAVOLU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 14. DUKKA NAGAMANI, W/O APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O 2ND BLOCK, PLOT NO.36, TF.4, RAJEEV GRUHAKALPA, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 15. DUKKA UMA SANKAR RAO, S/O ATCHI BABU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O 2ND BLOCK, PLOT NO.36, TF.4, RAJEEV GRUHAKALPA, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 16. B.VENKATA RAMA SARMA, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O H.NO.36C/79, TATAIAHGARI STREET, VIZIANAGARAM. 17. PADALA VENKAT REDDY, S/O VEER REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-19A, SIVANNARAYANA STREET, PANDLAPAKA, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3 18. SATTI SAMBASIVA REDDY, S/O JATLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O H.NO.8-101, POOSALAVARI STREET, KONDAKUDURU, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 19. T.SUDHAKARA REDDY, S/O VENKAT REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O H.NO.8-29, POOSALA VEEDHI, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 20. MALLIDI AMMI REDDY, S/O VEER REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O D.NO.14-3, CHINTHAVARI STREET, PEDAPUDI VILLAGE, G.MAMIDALA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 21. M.VERIKATARAMANA,, S/O SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O PARADESIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 22. M.APPALA NAIDU, S/O CHALLANNA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO.10-26, SIRJARN VILLAGE, CHEEDIKADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 23. P.VERIKAT REDDY, S/O SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O H.NO.5-28, BICCAVOLU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 24. TETHALA SUBBA REDDY, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.9-64, PALLAPUVARI STREET, KONDAKUDURU, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 25. GOLUGURI MANGA RATNAM, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO.8-90/A, PANDLAPAKA, BICCAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST. 26. MALLIDI CHINNA VENKAT REDDY, SR) GANGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O 16-11/1, MINOR NAGAR, PEDDAPUDI VILLAGE, G.MAMIDAD'A MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST. 27. D.KANAKAMMA, W/O MUSALAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O H.NO.4-26, BORAVANIPALEM, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4 28. KOVVADA SURYA PRASAD, S/O SATYA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O CHEEMALAPALLI ROAD, PORLUPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, POTHINA MALLAIAH PALEM (P.M.PALEM), VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.M.PALEM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. PARADESIPALEM PADMAVATHI HOUSING SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT I.RAMA RAO, D.NO.1-84-19, SECTOR-1V, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRINIVASULA REDDY KOMMASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6252 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the petitioners' house plots situated in Sy.Nos.66/1 and 66/2 (Old Sy.No.76A) Paradesipalem Village, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India an d consequently refrain the respondents from interfering with the petitioners' possession and enjoyment over their respective house plots situated in Sy.Nos.66/ 1 and 66/2 (Old Sy.No.76A) Paradesipalem Village, Visakhapatnam Rural, Visakhapatnam District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Srinivasula Reddy Kommasani, learned counsel for the petitioners is in attendance. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that preliminary enquiry of the police would reveal that it is a civil dispute, and therefore, police will not interfere in the matter. 4. The submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home are placed on record. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further orders are required in the writ petition, and it can be closed at the stage of admission. 6 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.08.2025 Pmk 7 06 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6252 OF 2019 Date: 04.08.2025 Pmk