MUSTAK AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND 2 OTHERS
A482/1143/2025 · 2025-02-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121710 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121710 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8155
Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1143 of 2025 Applicant :- Mustak Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant, after arguing at length, states that there are some formal defects in the present application, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file the same afresh with proper pleadings and documents in support thereof.
3. The prayer sought has not been opposed by learned A.G.A..
4. In view of the above, the instant application is rejected as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
5. The certified copy of the impugned order or any other certified document filed along with the application shall be returned to the
learned counsel for the applicant by retaining a photocopy of the same on record.
Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench