RAJESH SINGH @ PAPPU SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/1129/2025 · 2025-02-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121685 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121685 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8032 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1129 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajesh Singh @ Pappu Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhup Chandra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Shri Ravi Pratap Singh, learned Advocate has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and gone through the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief:-
"WHEREFORE it is most respectfully prayed that in the above noted facts and circumstances, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Criminal Case No. 3730/2023 pending before the Court of the F.T.C. (S.D.), Sultanpur under section 323, 325, 342, 452, 504, 506 IPC and against the charge sheet dated 29.03.2018 as well as against the summoning order dated 11.01.2022 passed by the leaned Court concerned in Criminal Case No. 3730/2023 (earlier registered as Crl. Case no.41/2022) relating Case Crime No.020/2018 under section 323, 325, 342, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Sangrampur, District Amethi on the basis of compromise dated 28.01.2025 done between the petitioners and opposite party no.2, so far as it relates with the petitioners in the interest of justice."
Learned counsel for the applicant(s) has submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No.5 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed.
Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e. Criminal Case No. 3730/2023, under sections 323, 325, 342, 452, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Sangrampur, District Amethi, pending before the Court of the F.T.C. (S.D.), Sultanpur, shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within four week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise to the Counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case.
Order Date :- 7.2.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench