Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-2429-2025 (O&
112 IN THE
Balvir Singh State of Punjab a
CORAM: HON
HON
Present:- Mr.
Mr.
SUDHIR SINGH
Petit Certiorari for qu village Latian W
2.
Lear nomination pape Wala, Tehsil Sul notice was issue stated to be rai respondent No.6 (Annexures P-2 adverted to till da (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
Date o versus njab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKH Mr. Keshav Chadha, Advocate for p Mr. Maninder Singh, Senior DAG P ***** SINGH, J. (ORAL) Petition herein, inter alia, is for issu for quashing the election proceedin ian Wala, Tehsil Sultanpur Lodhi, Dis
Learned counsel for the petitioner su papers for the post of Sarpanch, Gr sil Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurtha issued by respondent No.6, against be raised, however, no reason for t t No.6. The petitioner has made repr 2 and P-3) qua his grievance, ho till date. 1 of 2 JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-2429-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: January 30, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents UDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR e for petitioner. AG Punjab. issuance of a writ in the nature of ceedings/ process conducted in the i, District Kapurthala, Punjab. oner submits that petitioner had filed ch, Gram Panchayat, Village Latian purthala well in time, however, in a gainst petitioner, an objection was for the same has been given by representations dated 29.10.2024 ce, however, the same has not been
2
M) 2025 ioner s re of the filed atian a was n by 2024 been MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
CWP-2429-2025 (O&M)
2 of 2
3.
On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that now the election to the post of Sarpanch of the concerned village has been over, and in case, the petitioner has any grievance qua the same, he may file an election petition in terms of Sections 74 and 76 of the Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994 (for short ‘Act of 1994’) before the competent authority.
4.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file election petition in accordance with law.
5.
Ordered accordingly.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH)
JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR)
JUDGE January 30, 2025 mahavir
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.27 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment