Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121676 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR TIWARI v. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD.THRU. ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, LKO. 2 OTHERS

WRIC/1127/2025 · 2025-02-10

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8634-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1127 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd.Thru. Its Managing Director, Lko. 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Jauhari,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. During the course of hearing, Shri Manish Jauhari, learned Counsel for the Registry Corporation suggested that the Executive Engineer may be directed to get the facts verified as to whether the final assessment has been done in the case of the petitioner or not, as, there were three connections in the name of different family members including the petitioner, and it is not clear as of now, as to whether the final assessment has been made. In view of this, we grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the opposite party no. 2 raising his grievance in the matter who shall get the facts verified and take such decision as is required in law, but with expedition say within a period of four weeks. Till such decision is taken by the Executive Engineer, the impugned citation of recovery issued by the Revenue Authority shall not be given effect. Shri Nitish Shekhar, learned Standing Counsel shall communicate this order to the revenue authorities. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 10.2.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench