1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.405 of 2025 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 Harbinder Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Ms. Arushi Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks execution of decision rendered in Satnam Singh & Anr. Vs. State of H.P. & Anr.1, wherein directions were issued to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in accordance with law taking into consideration the decision rendered in State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. vs. Sardari Lal & Anr.2. The execution petition itself encloses an order passed by the respondents on 04.10.2024 deciding the case of the petitioner. Name of the petitioner figures at Serial No.2 of order dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure E-2). 1CWP No.5723 of 2023 decided on 23.08.2023. 2 CWP No.842 of 2017 decided on 07.07.2023 along with connected matters. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2. In view of above, this execution petition is disposed of. Petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law, in case he feels aggrieved against office order dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure E- 2). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 23rd May, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)