Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121631 (ALL)

HIMANSHU NIGAM @ DABBU AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER

CRLA/421/2025 · 2025-02-05

Karunesh Singh Pawar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7542 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 421 of 2025 Appellant :- Himanshu Nigam @ Dabbu And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Saket Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Kapildev Chaubey, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 who has filed vakalatnama which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court by way of compromise which is on record as Annexure No. 2 to the petition. It is further submitted that since the dispute has been settled outside the Court by the parties, the said compromise may be directed to be verified by the competent authority so that the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of said compromise and its verification report. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 2 has no objection to this innocuous prayer. In view of the above the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial court on 14.02.2025 along with the copy of original compromise deed, who shall verify the compromise in presence of the parties within one week thereafter and keep a report of the verification on the record of the Court after providing its copies to the parties. For a period of two months, the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1960/2022, (arising out of case crime no. 190/2021) U/s 505(2)/504/506/ I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(dha) and 3(2)(va) S.C./S.T. Act Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Lucknow shall be kept in abeyance. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of. Liberty to the parties is granted to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings on the basis of compromise and its verification. Office is directed to return the original compromise as well as certified copies of the documents filed along with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners as per Rules of the Court. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench