NADEEM KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/848/2025 · 2025-02-18
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121593 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121593 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10332 Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 848 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nadeem Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2, Mr. Mohd. Talib Khan, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for opposite party no.33. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite parties 3 to 32 stand dispensed with.
2. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to authority concerned for expeditious disposal of Partition Suit preferred by opposite party no.3 in which petitioner is one of the 31 defendants.
3. Since it is admitted that all the defendants have not yet put in appearance in the proceedings, no specific time-frame can be
directed at this stage since the proceedings are at the very inception.
4. In view thereof, the petition is consigned to record granting liberty to petitioner to approach this Court again in case of inordinate delay in decision in suit proceedings even once all the defendants have put in appearance.
Order Date :- 18.2.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench