TAJ MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/1250/2025 · 2025-02-11
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121587 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121587 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8746 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1250 of 2025 Applicant :- Taj Mohammad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. Learned AGA at the outset has submitted that against the impugned order, the petitioner has a statutory alternative remedy in form of an appeal under Section 29 of D.V. Act 2005 and therefore, the petition is not maintainable.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appeal which may be directed to be decided on merits. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal, which if filed within 20 days from today, the same shall be decided on merit by the learned court below.
Order Date :- 11.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench