Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121577 (ALL)

RAM KISUN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPARTMENT LKO. AND 1 OTHERS

A482/1016/2025 · 2025-02-05

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7370 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1016 of 2025 Applicant :- Ram Kisun And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Department Lko. And 1 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Himanshu Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned AGA for the State and perused the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief(s):- "WHEREFORE, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside/quash the entire proceedings of Crl. Case No.2658/2024 (State of U.P. Versus Gyanendra Kumar @ Bablu and others) arising out of impugned charge-sheet No. 06/2024, dated 15.01.2024 filed by the investigating officer in Case Crime No. 0628/2023, Under Section-419, 420, 504 & 506 I.P.C. pertaining to Police Station-Sandana, District-Sitapur and cognizance/summoning order dated 29.02.2024 passed by the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Sitapur by which the applicants/petitioners have been summoned for facing of trial under the said section of I.P.C, as contained in Annexure No. 1 and 2 respectively to this petition, in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant(s) has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant(s) to file bail application before the trial court, which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant(s). Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant(s) applies/apply for bail before the Court concerned, his/their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Liberty is also granted to the applicant(s) to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant(s) applies/apply for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench