Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12157 (RAJ)

RISHABH AJMERA S/O LT. SHRI BRIJMOHAN AJMERA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3916/2025 · 2025-05-30

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22655] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3916/2025 Rishabh Ajmera S/o Lt. Shri Brijmohan Ajmera, R/o Plot No. 3-4- 227/b Bajrang Joot Meel Quarters Pattabhipuram, Police Station Pattabhipuram, Guntoor Pin Code 522006, Aandhrapradesh, Haal Niwasi Plot No. A-301, Third Flore, Rojwood Apartment, Sirsi Road, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (Presently In Center Jail, Jaipur, Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheeshma Aswal For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Saroj Jat for Mr. Shafiqur UR Rahman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/05/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.8/2025 registered at Police Station- Ramganj (Jaipur City (North), District-Jaipur City (North) for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further [2025:RJ-JP:22655] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3916/2025] submits that the police have not sent any document for examination to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL); hence, the prosecution's allegation of forgery lacks substance. It is further submitted that the matter pertains to sale of a car, which at best, is prima facie civil in nature. Additionally, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Petitioner is behind the bars since 10.01.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Rishabh Ajmera S/o Lt. Shri Brijmohan Ajmera shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/139