AMARJIT SINGH AND ORS v. UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
RA-RF/62/2016 · 2025-01-30
Anil Kshetarpal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121503 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121503 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA No.62-CI of 2016 (O&M) in RFA No.2027 of 2011 Date of decision: 4.5.2016 Amarjit Singh and others ..... Applicants Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh ..... Non-applicant /Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Dhiman, Advocate for Mr. P.C. Dhiman, Advocate, for the applicants.
RAJESH BINDAL, J Under the garb of review application, the appeal is sought to be argued on merits referring to a subsequent judgment, which cannot be entertained. Dismissed. Consequently, the application seeking condonation of delay is also dismissed.
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE 4.5.2016 sharmila SHARMILA 2016.05.06 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document