Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12150 (UTT)

PANKAJ DUMKA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/1872/2025 · 2025-10-09

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.1872 of 2025 Pankaj Dumka ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Mr. Prasanna Karnatak, Advocates for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 20 of 2024, under Section 8/20/60/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Bhimtal, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 09.10.2025 Jitendra