2025:HHC:24911-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4409 of 2022 Decided on: 29.07.2025 Sandeep … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5-State. Mr. Bhanu Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When the matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw the petition, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Authority for redressal of his grievance. This is seriously opposed to by learned counsel for the respondents. 2. However, in the light of the prayer so made, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Fora he intends to, but it is subject to all just exceptions and legal rights of the private respondent. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 29, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?