Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.1883 of 2024
Kiran
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 02 of 2024, under Sections 302 & 120B IPC, Police Station Chakrata, District Dehradun. She has sought her release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
On 29.01.2023, at 5:00-6:00 early in the morning the informant was told that his brother has been killed and his dead body is kept in a room.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence. The role of hitting the deceased with danda has been assigned to the co- accused. Hence, it is a case fit for bail.
5.
Learned State counsel admits these facts.
2
6.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7.
The bail application is allowed.
8.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 14.02.2025 Jitendra