HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CM(M) No. 30/2022 Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner (s) Through: None Vs Kishor Kumar .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Shivaji Rathore, Advocate vice Mr. Arjun Singh Pathania, Advocate Respondent present in person. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 26.09.2025 01. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last two consecutive dates i.e. 29.07.2025 and 03.09.2025 and same is the position even as on today as well. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition, which has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 02. As such, the instant petition is dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s). 03. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 26.09.2025 Riya Kochhar S. No. 03