Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121402 (ALL)

JAGJEET SINGH @ MONU AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/963/2025 · 2025-02-07

Ajai Kumar Srivastava I, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7955-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 963 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagjeet Singh @ Monu And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hemant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. 1. Sri Avneesh Singh, Advocate, has filed his power on behalf of respondent No.4 today in Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondent and learned counsel representing the respondent no.4. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main prayer :- "(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the impugned First Information Report lodged against the Petitioner on 03/05/2024, registered at Police Station Manaknagar, District Lucknow, at FIR No.0031 of 2024 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 427 and 354 of the I.P.C. & Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act so far as the Petitioners are concerned, contained in (Annexure No.1) to the writ petition." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that earlier an F.I.R. was lodged by the respondent no.4 against the petitioners out of some misunderstanding, however a compromise has now been arrived at between the parties. A copy of the said compromise has been filed as Annexure No.2 to the petition. 5. Learned counsel representing the respondent no.4 does not dispute the contention made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 6. This petition is disposed of with a direction to the parties to approach the Investigating OfÏcer along with the compromise on 13.02.2025. The Investigating OfÏcer shall take a decision, in accordance with law, within two weeks thereafter. 7. For a period of four weeks or till such a decision is taken by the Investigating OfÏcer, the petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance of the impugned F.I.R. 8. The learned A.G.A. shall inform the Investigating OfÏcer concerned of the order passed today forthwith. 9. The Registry is directed to return the original compromise filed alongwith the writ petition after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Rahul Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench