1 APHC010142652020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8612/2020 Between: 1. KEERTI SAI LAKSHMI, W/O NAGESWARA RAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO.3-95, A-SURAVARAM VILLAGE, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSIPATNARN, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NATHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. SRI RAMESH, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. GADAM KONDAL RAO, S/O SURYANARNYANA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O GANDHINAGARAM NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. GADAM SATYANARAYANA, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O GANDHINAGARARN VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 to 5 in not acted upon the complaint dated 20.04.2020 made by 2 the petitioner against the 6th 7th respondents is highly illegal arbitrary and in violation of articles 14 21 and 300A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents no 2 to 5 to act upon the complaint made by the petitioner on 20.04.2020 against the 6th and 7th respondents in accordance with law by providing protection to the petitioner” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 01.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8612 of 2020 Dt.01.09.2025 Asr