Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 356
CWP-20194-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.11.2025
AJAI PAL AND ORS.
...Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- None for the petitioners
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G. Haryana
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent to finalize their seniority as R.T. Operators and to promote them as Head Constables.
2.
Learned State counsel submits that petitioners No.1 and 2 have already retired on attaining the age of superannuation and petitioner No.3 was promoted. At present he is holding rank of ASI, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous.
3.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
4.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE November 04, 2025 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2025.11.04 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document