Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9636 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1774 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anjani Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Agriculture Marketing And Foreign Trade Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Naresh Chandra Mehrotra Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Jitendra Singh, learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Sri Aditya Mohn, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 4. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner was appointed in the year 1996 as a work charge employee and has worked contentiously but her services has not been regularised in accordance with U.P. (Outside the Purview of U.p. Public Service Commission) Group-C and Group-D Daily Rated, Work Charge and on Contract Basis Regularization Rules, 2016 despite repeated representations made by her. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.12.2024 (Annexure No. 7) in a time bound manner. 4. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 22.12.2024 (Annexure No. 7) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 14.2.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench