Sanket Verma @ Anil Verma v. State of U.P. THRU SEC. HOME DEPTT AND ANOTHER
A482/950/2025 · 2025-02-04
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121384 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7018 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 950 of 2025 Applicant :- Sanket Verma @ Anil Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Sec. Home Deptt And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Pratap,Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Sri Ayush Pratap Singh, Advocate, says that he has uploaded his Vakalatnama on behalf of the private opposite party No. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):-
"WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may Kindly be pleased to quash the impugned criminal proceeding in Session Trial no. 831/2016, arising out of case crime no. 537/2015, FIR no. 0467/2015, U/s 307,504 I.P.C., at P.S- Madiyaon, District Lucknow, may kindly be decided in terms of compromise, between the O.P. no. 2 and the Petitioner they have entered into compromise and they have settled their dispute outside the court as such, they do not want to contest the case further. Annexed as Annexure No.2."
Learned counsel for the applicant(s) submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and also taking note of the fact that it is a no injury case and accordingly, the proceedings in issue can be quashed based upon the compromise in view of various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court on the issue including the judgment passed in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the court. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the
concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case.
Order Date :- 4.2.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench