SMT. KAUSHILYA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/9765/2021 · 2025-09-11
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12137 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12137 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9765 of 2021 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 26.09.2020 passed by the respondent No.2-Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Mohammadabad, District Ghazipur whereby the application of the petitioner for mutation has been rejected on the ground that the required documents were not supplied alongwith the application. However, he has permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application for mutation alongwith all the necessary documents so as to maintain the transparency in the mutation proceedings.
3. Since the respondent No.2-Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Mohammadabad, District Ghazipur has already permitted the petitioner to file a fresh application alongwith necessary documents, therefore, We do not find good ground to interfere with the impugned order.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, it is open to the petitioner to file a fresh application alongwith necessary documents in the light of permission granted by the respondent No.2-Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad, Mohammadabad, District Ghazipur in the impugned order dated 26.09.2020. September 12, 2025 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Kaushilya Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad