1 TA-42-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.113 TA-42-2024 Date of Decision: 06.02.2025 UPASANA SAINI ....Applicant Versus SANJEEV SAINI .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- Mr. Tarun Hans, Advocate for the applicant. Respondent proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 23.01.2025. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) ! "# " ! $%#&!' %& % ( !) * ! % ! + It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 03.04.2021, but no child was born from the said wedlock. However, on account of the matrimonial discord, the parties are residing separate. The applicant is residing at her parental place at Hansi. She is not having any source of earning. Also, it is Sonu 2025.02.06 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2 TA-42-2024 pointed out by the counsel for the applicant that the respondent is working in Kiran Foreign Trade, as a Team Leader in Alpha IT City, SAS Nagar and is earning Rs.65,000/- per month. In the given circumstances, it is submitted that it is difficult for the applicant to commute a distance of about 130 kilometres, to defend the divorce petition. In view of the aforesaid fact situation and also considering the position of law about preference to be given to the convenience of the wife in the transfer applications relating to the matrimonial dispute, more particularly, when the respondent has not come forward to resist the application, the transfer application is allowed and ! "# " ! % $%#&!'!& % ( ! ) , " "# $%#&!'!) -! + ) -!! $%#&.&%&/ 01 ! "$%#&.&%&/ ! % %# (ARCHANA PURI) 06.02.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No Sonu 2025.02.06 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document