Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010098232025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2491/2025 MS RAJ GROUP REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR SRI R. J. PADMARAJ, AGE ABOUT 49 YEARS, SON OF V. P JANAKAN PILLAI, RESIDENT OF V P, VETTUKATTIL HOUSE, JAI NIVAS, PANCODE, AIKARANAD SOUTH, DADAYAMPADI, ERNAKULAM, KUNNATHUNAD, KERELA, PIN 682308 2: SRI R J PADMARAJ SON OF V. P JANAKAN PILLAI RESIDENT OF V P VETTUKATTIL HOUSE JAI NIVAS PANCODE AIKARANAD SOUTH VADAYAMPADI ERNAKULAM KUNNATHUNAD KERELA PIN 68230 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, DEPARTMENT/MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAIL BHAWAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI110001 2:DIRECTOR (TOURISM AND CATERING) RAILWAY BOARD RAIL BHAWAN RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI-110001. 3:THE NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAYS THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER MALIGAON Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI PIN - 781011 ASSAM 4:CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI PIN - 781011 ASSAM 5:SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN - 782447. 6:DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER (TC) NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT- HOJAI ASSAM PIN - 782447. 7:DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER COMMERCIAL NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISION LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN - 782447. 8:ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING DIVISIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT - HOJAI ASSAM PIN - 782447 9:GUJARAT CO OPERATIVE MILK MARKETING FEDERATION LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT FIRST FLOOR HOUSEFED COMMERCIAL COMPLEX RUKMINIGAON G.S ROAD GUWAHATI Page No.# 3/3 PIN - 781022 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A BANERJEE, MR BHUBAN SHARMA,MR SUBHRAJIT SAIKIA,MR. N SARKAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER 09.05.2025 Mr. N. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of their grievance. Mr. H. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 8 submits that he has got no objection to the same. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant