RAVIKAR TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. JALSHAKTI DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/1413/2025 · 2025-02-17
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121322 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 121322 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9991-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1413 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravikar Tiwari And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Jalshakti Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Narain Srivastava,Pawan Kumar Verma,Prashant Chaurasia,Shailendra Kumar Misra,Vartika Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed today by Shri Parimal Bhatt, Advocate on behalf of opposite party No.2 to 5 is taken on record.
2. Heard.
3. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the claim for payment of dues by the opposite party Nos.2 to 4 to the petitioners is admitted in Annexure No.9, however, in the same vein he says that these documents were changed that is why Annexure No.1 is being challenged.
4. Counsel for the contesting opposite parties raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of existence of an Arbitration Clause. He also says that the amount being claimed is not admitted by the said opposite parties.
5. In view of the aforesaid, we see no reason to proceed any further in the matter. The petitioners may avail other remedies prescribed under law.
6. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 17.2.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench