APHC010141942001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 567/2001 Between: Secy. Vsp Urban Dev Autority Vsp ...APPELLANT AND Oduri Sriranga Udaya Bhanu Kumar ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. SUMALINI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 25.07.1994 passed in A.S.No.43 of 1991 on the file of learned II Additional District Judge’s Court, Visakhapatnam, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 21.06.1988 passed in O.S.No.322 of 1985 on the file of learned IV Additional District Munsif Court at Visakhapatnam. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:29.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.567 OF 2001 Date:29.01.2025 MS