OM GURU TRADERS v. UTTARAKHAND VAN VIKAS NIGMA DEHRADUN
WPMS/107/2023 · 2025-02-25
Ashish Naithani, G Narendar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1213 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1213 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:1326-DB SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
25.02.2025
WPMS No. 107 of 2023 Hon’ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
1. Sri Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. Mr. V.K. Kapruwan,
learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant Writ Petition, challenging the rejection of his bid, and allotment of the tender to a third party, has been rendered infructuous, as the department has initiated retendering process.
4. In that view, the submission of the learned counsel is placed on record, and the Writ Petition is
disposed off, as having been rendered infructuous.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
(Ashish Naithani, J.) (G. Narendar, C.J.) 25.02.2025 25.02.2025 Rahul