Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121292 (ALL)

AMAR NATH v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY COMMUNICATION NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1447/2025 · 2025-02-05

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7250 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1447 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Communication New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deo Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dwijendra Mishra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Anand Dwivedi, learned Counsel for Union of India and Shri Dwijendra Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite parties no.2 and 3. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that privilege leave encashment has not been paid though the petitioner has retired way back on 30.04.2023. 3. Nevertheless, considering the nature of grievance, the petition is disposed of with the direction to the opposite party no.3 to look into the matter, verify the facts and take a decision as regards payment of privilege leave encashment to the petitioner within two months from the date a copy of this order is submitted. Needless to say that if any interest is payable on the said amount, the same shall also be paid as per rules. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench