PANCHANAND MAHTO @ PANCHANAND YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2658/2025 · 2025-05-06
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12124 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12124 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:13567 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2658 of 2025
----- 1.Panchanand Mahto @ Panchanand Yadav,S/o Late Rupan Mahto 2.Yasoda Devi @ Jaswa Devi, W/o Panchanand Mahto @ Panchanand Yadav 3.Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Yadav @ Lalu Kumar @ Sunny Kumar Yadav 4.Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Yadav, both are sons of Panchanand Mahto @ Panchanand Yadav 5.Manisha Kumari @ Anisha Kumari, W/o Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Yadav All are R/o Village Gadgi, P.O. Parsabad, P.S. Jainagar, District- Koderma
.... Petitioner(s).
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Respondent(s)
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Addl. PP
…......
02/ 06.05.2025: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing of anticipatory bail application notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS has been issued to the petitioners. He submits that if notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS has been issued it will be presumed that there is no necessity to arrest these petitioners. Thus, he wants to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to these petitioners to appear before the Investigating Officer in terms of notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) R.S./