Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:8188-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 955 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Karan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faiz Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Srivastava-I,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A., who appears on behalf of State-respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.4. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer :- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned first information report dated 23.11.2024 in case crime no.889/2024 U/s-419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Gonda contained as (Annexure No.1) to this writ petition." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is completely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the impugned F.I.R. 4. The allegation is regarding an entry made in the revenue records on 02.12.1972 and such entry being forged. It has been submitted that a copy of the enquiry report dated 25.01.2018 which has been made the basis of the impugned F.I.R. has also been filed by the petitioner as Annexure No.2 to this petition, wherein, it has been stated that Lekhpal concerned had made the alleged forged entry. 5. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court a copy of the instructions dated 04.02.2025 sent by the Inspector/Investigating Officer, Arvind Kumar Yadav, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda. 6. It has been submitted by Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4 that the entry made in 1972 is forged as has been found by the Consolidation Officer, the SOC and also the TDC in revision and finally has not been overturned at any stage regarding entry being forged. The entry has been made in favour of the petitioner, who is the beneficiary even though by a revenue official as argued by the petitioner. 7. We have gone through the F.I.R. and also the instructions which are kept on record from the instructions it is evident that it was the petitioner, who interfere such forged entry to be made in his favour by colluding with the revenue officials. 8. We do not find any good ground to show interference in the impugned F.I.R. 9. The writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Shubhankar Digitally signed by :- SHUBHANKAR THAKUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench