IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7253 OF 2025 Between: 1. Golagani Nookalamma, W/o.Yarranna, Aged about 59yrs E. No.4-12, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District -533 406. 2. Guna Chandravathi, W/o.Appanna, Aged about 52yrs, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 3. Guna Malleswari, S/o.Pugappa, Aged about 40yrs D.No.4-16,NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 4. Guna Varahalamma, S/o.Pugappa, Aged about 44yrs D.No.1-621 ,NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. ...PETITIONER’S AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., By its. Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Building, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Superintendent of police, Kakinada District, Kakinada. 3. Station House Officer, Rowthulapudi police station, Rowthulapudi Mandal Kakinada District. 4. Allam Satyanarayanamurthy Padal, S/o.Pedavenkanna padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 5. Allam Venkata Narasimhaacharyulu Padal, S/o.Pedavenkanna padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 6. Allam China Venkanna Padal, S/o.Sanyasayya padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 7. Allam Ramanna Padal, S/o.Sanyasi padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 'W 8. Allam Lakshmana Padal, S/o.Peda Venkanna padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 9. Allam Ramam Dora, S/o.Sanyasayya padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. Allam Sanyasayya padal, S/o. Peda venkanna padal, NN Patnam village, Rowthulapudi Mandal, Kakinada District-533 406. 10. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order, more particularly a writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent for not filing the First Information Report (FIR) as per the complaint of the petitioners dated 04.03.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, and a gross abuse of power. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^'^ respondent to take action against respondents 4 to 10 for the attack on Scheduled Tribe women pending the disposal of the main writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'"' respondent to follow the Supreme Court of India guidelines regarding the registration of the First Information Report (FIR) in Lalita Kumari vs. Government of U.P. & Ors on 12‘^ November 2013. According to these guidelines, while ensuring and protecting the rights of both the accused and the complainant, a preliminary inquiry should be conducted in a time-bound manner, and in no case should it exceed 7 days. The fact of any delay and the reasons for it must be reflected in the General Diary entry, pending the disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. INAPURAPU SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No’s.4 to 10: — The Court made the following ORDER: APHC010142442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7253/2025 Between: Golagani Nookalamma, and Others ...PETITIONER{S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1. INAPURAPU SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction of respondent No.3 in not considering the petitioners’ complaintdated 04.03.2025. 2 Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits 3. that the petitioners’ complaint dated 04.03.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined 4. to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing respondent No.3 to consider the petitioners’ complaint dated 04.03.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3)of BNSS, 2023. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order 5. as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTER //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SEC To, 1. The Principal Secretary Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Building, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of police, Kakinada District, Kakinada. 3. The Station House Officer, Rowthulapudi police station, Rowthulapudi Mandal Kakinada District. 4. One CC to SRI. INAPURAPU SURYANARAYANA, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies PRK f HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.7253 of 2025 X 0 2 AM 2cn I ^ . Current Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS