Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121211 (ALL)

JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A482/987/2025 · 2025-02-05

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7281 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 987 of 2025 Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Yadav,Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Shri Abhay Pratap Yadav, learned Advocate has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State of U.P. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and gone through the record. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief:- "WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the entire proceedings of the Session trial No.744/2020 (State Vs. Jitendra Kumar Yadav), hereinafter referred to as 'the impugned proceedings' as well as charge sheet dated 20.03.2020, under section-323, 504 and 506 of I.P.C. & 3(1) Da and 3(1) Dhha of SC / ST act, arising out of case Crime No. 11/2020, Police Station - Malihabad, District- Lucknow, and the impugned summoning order dated 07.07.2020 along with consequential proceedings, Passed by learned court of Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, Lucknow, (Contained as annexure no.1 to 3)in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Trial Court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings i.e., Session Trial No.744/2020 (State Vs. Jitendra Kumar Yadav), under sections 323, 504 and 506 of I.P.C. & 3(1) Da and 3(1) Dhha of SC / ST act, arising out of case Crime No. 11/2020, Police Station - Malihabad, District- Lucknow, shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned Court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned Court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned Court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within four week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned Court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise to the Counsel for the applicant, after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench