Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12119 (RAJ)

DEEPAK @ BABU S/O SHRI SHYOJIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4130/2025 · 2025-05-05

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18720] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 4130/2025 Deepak @ Babu S/o Shri Shyojiram, R/o Pratappura, Police Station Lambaharisingh, Distt. Tonk. At Present R/o Plot No. 38, Maa Shakambhari Nagar, Gandhi Parth West, Lalerpura, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Police Station Karni Vihar, Distt. Jaipur, Raj. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Malpura, Distt. Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Gaharana For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/05/2025 1. This second bail application is filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 85/2024 registered at Police Station Diggi, District Tonk for offences punishable u/S 341, 323 & 307 IPC. 2. The first bail application bearing No. 7839/2024 filed by the accused petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 25.09.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application. 3. Heard and considered. 4. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2024 and the injured witness is safe and healthy. He further submits that the alleged incident took place because his wife was not returning to home [2025:RJ-JP:18720] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4130/2025] and now she has already gone into 'nata marriage' with some other person. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that the accused petitioner has inflicted repeated injuries to Ashok Meghvanshi and out of total four injuries, three have been opined to be dangerous to life and the injuries are by sharp weapon. 6. On consideration of the submissions and perusal of material available on record, the injury report of the injured Ashok Meghvanshi reflects that the accused petitioner has inflicted four sharp weapon injuries out of which three have been opined to be dangerous to life. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case including the background of the matter and more particularly the fact that the accused petitioner has inflicted three dangerous to life injuries to Ashok Meghvanshi, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, this second bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /5