Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 121186 (ALL)

VIMLA DEVI @ VIMLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDU. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/1413/2025 · 2025-02-04

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7157 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1413 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vimla Devi @ Vimla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Edu. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents-State No.1, Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3 and Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 4.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench