Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12113 (HP)

ARUN VIMAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

EX.P./482/2025 · 2025-07-08

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.482 of 2025 Decided on: 8th July 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Arun Vimal & Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 07.07.2025 from the Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh to the effect that the Deputy Director Elementary Education, Kullu, H.P. has implemented the judgment rendered in Arun Vimal & Ors. Vs. State of H.P. & Ors2. Office order dated 07.07.2025, passed by the Deputy Director Elementary Education, Kullu, has also been made part of the aforesaid 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 CWP No.15474 of 2024, decided alongwith connected matters on 08.01.2025 - 2 - office instructions. 2. In terms of the office order, cases of the petitioners have been considered in light of decision rendered in Mohit Sharma and Anr. Vs. State of H.P. and others3. Similarly situated petitioners have been allowed higher pay scale in the concerned level of pay matrix on completion of two years of regular service. The DDO concerned have also been directed to fix petitioners’ pay. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General, on the strength of aforesaid order, assured that necessary and consequential orders shall be passed by the respondents within three weeks from today. Financial benefits based thereupon shall also be released to the petitioners within the aforesaid period. 4. Taking note of above documents and submissions made by learned Additional Advocate General, present execution petition is disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of their surviving grievance, if any, in accordance with law. 3 CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024. - 3 - Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge July 8, 2025 R.Atal