RAJU DURGA RAO v. THE KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
WP/7304/2025 · 2025-03-21
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12108 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12108 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7304 OF 2025 Between:
1. Raju Durga Rao, S/o. Raju Papa Rao (late), Aged about 45 years, Occ: Public Health Worker, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District (East Godavari District). 2. N. Veerraju, S/o. Satyanarayana, Aged about 44 years, Occ; Sanitary Maistry Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District (East Godavari District). 3. Y. Durga Rao, S/o. Veeraraghavulu, Aged about 44 years, Occ; Sanitary Maistry, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, KakinsfSa District (East Godavari District). 4. A. Satti Babu, S/o. Satyaraju, Aged about 56 years, Occ Sanitary Maistry, Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Kakinada District (East Godavari District) ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The Kakinada Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner, Kakinada, Kakinada District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Municipal Administration Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or directions more particularly. one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1 respondent not disposing of the petitioners representation dated 07.11.2023 filed by the petitioners for promotion to the post of Health f Assistants as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, discrimination and yjoiation of Principles of Natural Justice apart from violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1 respondent consider and dispose of representations dated 07.11.2023. St » St lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1 St respondent to consider and dispose of representation dated 07.11.2023 by the petitioners for the promotion to the post of Health Assistants.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. S. N. SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI M. KRISHNA RAO, SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR SERVICES-I The Court made the following: ORDER
w APHC010142102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7304/2025 Between: Raju Durga Rao and Others ‘ ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Kakinada Municipal Corporation and Others Counsel for the Petitioner{S); ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.TS N SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“to declare the action of the 1®* respondent not disposing of the petitioners representation dated 07.11.2023 filed by the petitioners for promotion to the post of Health Assistants as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, discrimination and
f 2 CGRJ W.P. No.7304of2025 violation of Principles of Natural Justice apart from violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 1®* respondent to consider and dispose of representations dated 07.11.2023 and to such other orders.” V pass Heard Sri T.S.N.Sudhakar, learned counsel for petitioners Sri M.Krishna Rao, learned standing counsel for the 1 respondent and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services -1 for the 2^^ respondent. 2. St 1®‘ petitioner was appointed as Public Health Worker in the I year 2002 and petitioners 2 to 4 have been appointed as Sanitary Maistry at different periods. All petitioners were appointed on compassionate grounds. Petitioners have completed Diploma in Public Health and Sanitation Technology in the year 2018 and their services were regularized. 3. 4.
Petitioners claim that they are eligible and qualified for promotion to the post of Health Assistants and that in respect of various other Municipalities and Corporations, persons who have been working as Health Workers/ Sanitary Maistrys were I considered for promotion to the post of Health Assistants. 3 CGR, J W.P. No.7304 of 2025
5. Learner counsel for petitioners by referring to proceedings Roc.No.1353/2013/A1, dated 12.01.2022 which relates to Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, submits that Public Health Workers and Sanitary Maistrys were duly considered in i that particular case for promotion to the post of Health Assistant, therefore, similar benefit be extended to the petitioners. Petitioners have submitted representation dated 07.11.2023 to 1®* respondent, however, the same is pending and no orders have been passed so far. 6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for 2’^'* respondent and learned Standing Counsel appearing for 1®‘ respondent submits that the representation made by petitioners will be considered in accordance with law. 7. In view of the aforesaid submission, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1®* respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representationsubmitted by the petitioners dated 07.11.2023 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 4 CGR, J W.P. No.7304 of 2025 A As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions
consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. pending Sd/. K. TATA RAO deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER
1. The Municipal Commissioner, Kakinada Kakinada, Kakinada District.
2. The Principal Secretary to Govt., Municipal Administration Urban Development Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
3. One CC to Sri T. S. N. Sudhakar,
4. One CC to Sri M. Krishna Rao, SC for Municipal
5. Two CCs to GP for Services-I
6. Three CD Copies. Municipal Corporation Advocate [OPUC] Corporations[OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] ssb
% HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025
ORDER S’-^ANDH^ WP.No.7304 of 2025 * nm«n g ^ . Curreni Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS