Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12107 (UTT)

MANJU BAHUGUNA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1098/2024 · 2025-03-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1098 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. D.N. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA with Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this matter, FIR has been lodged against respondent no.4, and thus, the purpose of filing this petition has been achieved. 4. In such view of the matter, nothing remains to be done. The petition is thus, closed. \ (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.03.2025 R.Dang